JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)November 15, 1994

T-510 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Adolfo Enrique Ramos

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Igualdad. Der. A La Educacion. Menor Que No Es Aceptada En Colegio Por Estar Sus Padres Casados Por Lo Civil. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Matrimonio Civil
  • Admisión de hijos en colegio
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. Ordénase a la Hermana Ana Fernández Calderón, rectora del Colegio Nuestra Señora de la Presentación del Centro de Santafé de Bogotá, o a quien desempeñe tal cargo, tramitar el ingreso de la niña Yessica Andrea Ramos Romero, en las condiciones de igualdad descritas en esta sentencia, para el año lectivo de 1995.
  2. Segundo. Solicítase al Secretario de Educación de Santafé de Bogotá, doctor Eduardo Barajas Sandoval, o a quien desempeñe tal cargo, designar un funcionario que se encargue de supervigilar el trámite de ingreso de Yessica Andrea Ramos Romero, al Colegio Nuestra Señora de la Presentación del Centro. Tal funcionario informará a esta Corte sobre el resultado de su gestión, en el término de treinta (30) días comunes, contados a partir de la fecha de esta sentencia. E igual informe rendirá al Juzgado 59 Civil Municipal de Bogotá.
  3. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.