JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 21, 1992

T-498 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Ciro Angarita Baron

✓Claimant Ramiro Sanchez

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Peticion. Debido Proceso. Mora Judicial. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por la Sala Penal de Decision del Tribunal Superior de Medellin, del 30 de marzo de 1992, por medio del cual se concedio la tutela interpuesta por Ramiro Sanchez Alvarez en contra de la Direccion Seccional de Orden Publico de Medellin, con el alcance y por las razones expuestas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. ORDENAR que por Secretaria se envien copias de esta providencia a la Fiscalia General de la Nacion, a la Fiscalia Regional de Medellin, a la Procuraduria Delegada para la Vigilancia Judicial y a la Procuraduria Delegada para la Policia Judicial.
  3. TERCERO. ORDENAR que por Secretaria se comunique esta providencia al Tribunal Superior de Medellin, en la forma y para los efectos previstos en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
  4. Notifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.