JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 26, 1994

T-466 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Antonio Maria Ordoñez

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Peticion En Relacion Con La Rehabilitacion De Los Ders. Politicos Despues De Haber Cumplido Una Pena. Gigante-Huila.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

4 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. R E S U E L V E
  2. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la Sentencia del Juzgado Unico Civil del Municipio de Gigante proferida el 2 de Junio de 1994 por las razones expuestas en esta providencia.
  3. SEGUNDO. CONCEDER la tutela impetrada por el senor Antonio Maria Ordonez Artunduaga en relacion con sus derechos politicos y de peticion, y prevenir al Juez Unico Penal de Gigante para que no vuelva a incurrir en la omision que dio lugar a la tutela.
  4. TERCERO. ENVIAR copias de esta providencia al Consejo Superior de la Judicatura para que investigue la actuacion del Juez Unico Penal Municipal de Gigante respecto de los hechos que dieron lugar a la accion de tutela que se revisa.
  5. CUARTO. ORDENAR que por Secretaria se comunique esta providencia al Juzgado Unico Civil del Municipio de Gigante (Huila), en la forma y para los efectos previstos en el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.