JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)October 26, 1994

T-462 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Asociacion De Exempleados Del Banco Popular

✓
Topic · hard data
Propiedad Accionaria. Bonos Pensionales. Der. De Peticion. Banco Popular. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR, por las razones expuestas y con las observaciones que aquí se consignan, el fallo de fecha 29 de junio de 1994, proferido por el Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. Laboral del Circuito de Santa Fe de Bogotá, al resolver sobre la acción de tutela instaurada por la Asociación de Ex-empleados del Banco Popular "ASOEXBANPO".
  3. Segundo. ADICIONASE la Sentencia revisada en el sentido de negar la tutela en lo concerniente al Instituto de Seguros Sociales.
  4. Tercero. ADVIERTESE al Gobierno Nacional y al Fondo de Garantías de Instituciones Financieras -FOGAFIN- que, cuando se reanude el proceso de venta de las acciones que posee el Estado en el Banco Popular, deberán dar aplicación al artículo 60 de la Constitución Política.
  5. Para el efecto, se remitirá copia de esta providencia al Ministro de Hacienda y Crédito Público y al Director de FOGAFIN.
  6. Cuarto. Líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.