JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 4, 2001

T-447 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Yanira Coronado Avendaño Y Otros Vs. La Nacion Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Incremento Salarial Empleados Publicos Año 2000. Improcedencia De La Tutela Para Modificar Las Politicas Salariales De Caracter General Fijadas Por Las Autoridades Competentes. No Procedencia De La Tutela Como Mecanismo Transitorio. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Transitoria
  • Improcedencia incremento salarial para servidores públicos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR los fallos proferidos por el Juzgado 1deg Penal del Circuito de Cienaga (Expedientes T-412594, T-412595, T-412596, T-412597, T-412598, T-412599, T-412600, T-412601, T-412602, T-412603, T-412604), el fallo proferido por el Juzgado 11deg Civil Municipal de Medellin (Expediente T-413473), el fallo proferido por el Juzgado 1deg Penal del Circuito de Turbo (Expediente T-413594) y los fallos proferidos por la Sala Laboral (Conjueces) del Tribunal Superior de Medellin (T-413657, T-413659 y T-413660).
  2. Segundo. DENEGAR el amparo solicitado por los actores.
  3. Tercero. DESE cumplimiento a lo previsto por el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.