JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)August 20, 1998

T-437 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa

✓Claimant Jorge Eliecer Escorcia Garcia

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Reconocimiento De Prestaciones Sociales. Cajanal. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Pronta resolución y decisión de fondo
  • Carácter excepcional de aplazamiento de respuesta
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida el 6 de Febrero de 1998, por medio de la cual el Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Penal Municipal de Barranquilla resolvio la accion de tutela interpuesta por el ciudadano JORGE ELIECER ESCORCIA GARCIA en contra de la Caja Nacional de Prevision.
  3. Segundo. En su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela impetrada por JORGE ELIECER ESCORCIA GARCIA y, en consecuencia, ORDENAR a la Caja Nacional de Prevision CAJANAL -Subdireccion de Prestaciones Economicas- que, a mas tardar dentro de las cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificacion del presente fallo, resuelva de fondo, concreta y completamente, sobre la solicitud elevada, el 20 de agosto de 1997 por el actor, si todavia no lo ha hecho.
  4. Tercero. La Procuraduria General de la Nacion investigara la conducta disciplinaria de los servidores publicos de CAJANAL que hubieren dado lugar a la violacion del derecho que se protege. Remitasele copia de este fallo.
  5. Cuarto. DESE cumplimiento a lo previsto en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Reporting justice
✓
Alfredo Beltrán Sierra
Magistrado
✓
Antonio Barrera Carbonell
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 2cited by 0 →T-437/98T-038/97 — Der. De Peticion. Reconocimiento Y Pago De Pension De Jubilacion. Fondo De Pensiones Territorial De Santander. Concedida. · cited 135 timesT-038/971997T-265/98 — Der. De Peticion. Solicitud De Reconocimiento Y Pago De Pension De Jubilacion. Cajanal. Concedida. · cited 6 timesT-265/981998
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites2
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.