JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 27, 2000

T-357 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Lucio Velasquez Coral

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho Al Minimo Vital. Mora En El Pago De Mesadas Pensionales. Universidad Del Valle. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Institucion Universitaria Publica
  • Situación económica o presupuestal no es óbice para desconocer obligaciones laborales
Acción De Tutela
  • Procedencia excepcional pago de acreencias laborales
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cali, Sala Laboral y la Corte Suprema de Justicia, Sala de Casación Laboral.
  2. Segundo. CONCEDER la protección solicitada por Lucio Velásquez Coral y, por tanto, ORDENAR al Rector de la Universidad del Valle que, en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificación de la presente providencia, si no lo hubiere hecho ya, proceda a cancelar la totalidad de las mesadas pensionales adeudadas al actor.
  3. Tercero. PREVENIR al ente demandado para que en el futuro evite incurrir en las omisiones que generaron la instauración de la acción de tutela.
  4. Cuarto. DAR cumplimiento por Secretaría General a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.