JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 21, 2000

T-319 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Pensionados Ferroviarios De Acerias Paz Del Rio

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Asociacion Sindical. Retencion Aportes De Los Pensionados Con Destino A La Asociacion Sindical. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Indefension
  • Retención de aportes de pensionados con destino a Asociación
Derecho De Asociacion
  • Traslado de aportes de pensionados
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR los fallos proferidos por el Juzgado Laboral del Circuito de Duitama y por la Sala Civil-Familia-Laboral del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Rosa de Viterbo, mediante los cuales se negó el amparo solicitado, y, en su lugar, CONCEDER la tutela.
  2. ORDENASE a la sociedad demandada que, en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas contadas a partir de la notificación de esta providencia, traslade a la "Asociación de Pensionados Ferroviarios de Acerías Paz del Río" los aportes de los pensionados, según las normas vigentes.
  3. Segundo. DAR cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.