JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 28, 1993

T-297 de 1993

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Martha Ordoñez

✓
Topic · hard data
Obligacion De Prestar Servicio Militar. Causales Taxativas. Union De Hecho. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Servicio Militar Obligatorio
  • Exenciones previstas en la Ley
Servicio Militar
  • Incorporación
  • Minoría de edad
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo proferido el 19 de marzo de 1993 por el Juzgado
  2. Quinto. Penal Municipal de Santiago de Cali para resolver sobre la acción instaurada.
  3. Segundo. DENIEGASE la tutela que solicita MARTHA ISABEL ORDOÑEZ VALBUENA.
  4. Tercero. El Ejército Nacional dará estricto cumplimiento a lo previsto en el artículo 39 de la Ley 48 de 1993.
  5. Cuarto. Líbrese la comunicación prevista en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.