JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)July 4, 1996

T-293 de 1996

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Blanca Lelis Rodriguez Romero

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Reconocimiento De Cesantias Parciales. Fondo Prestacional Del Magisterio. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho De Peticion
  • Resolución escrita
  • Pronta resolución
1 topic · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Once Penal del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá, D.C., por las razones expuestas en esta sentencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. CONCEDER la tutela del derecho de petición de la señora Blanca Lelis Rodríguez Romero, ordenando al Fondo Prestacional del Magisterio y a la Fiduciaria la Previsora, que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contado a partir de la notificación, den respuesta a la solicitud de pago de cesantías parciales, presentada por la actora, tal como se indico en la parte motiva de esta sentencia.
  3. TERCERO. COMUNICAR, por intermedio de la Secretaria General de la Corte Constitucional, el contenido de la sentencia al Juzgado Quince Penal Municipal de Santafé de Bogotá D.C., para que sean notificadas las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.