JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 29, 1999

T-289 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Jenny Marriaga Moreno Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Minimo Vital. Der. Al Trabajo. Mora En El Pago De Salarios. Hospital. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Salario
  • Situación económica o presupuestal de entidad no es óbice para desconocer pago oportuno
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. DECISION
  2. Primero. REVOCAR las sentencias proferidas por el juzgado veintisiete penal municipal (T-201650) y Trece Penal del Circuito de Cali (T-203132). En consecuencia, conceder la tutela por el derecho al trabajo y ordenar al Director del Hospital Mario Correa Rengifo, que en el termino de ocho dias contados a partir de la notificacion de esta sentencia, cancele los salarios adeudados a las actoras. En el evento de que no exista la disponibilidad presupuestal, el Director del Hospital, debera, en el mismo termino, iniciar los tramites que le permitan cumplir lo ordenado.
  3. Segundo. Prevenir al Hospital Departamental Mario Correa Rengifo de la ciudad de Cali, para que en el futuro evite incurrir en las omisiones ilegitimas que ocasionaron las presentes tutelas.
  4. Tercero. LIBRENSE las comunicaciones de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.