JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 17, 2005

T-261 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Juan Gabriel Torres Leguizamon Vs. Director Carcel Distrital De Armenia

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Derecho A La Igualdad
  • Diferencias entre medidas que implican un trato discriminatorio y las que se basan en circunstancias objetivas y razonables
Permiso Laboral Para Estudio De Empleados Del Inpec
  • Regulación en artículo 18 del Decreto ley 407 de 1994
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la igualdad y la educación de funcionario del inpec que se desempeña como dragoneante y cursa estudios superiores de contaduría por la negativa del director del establecimiento de concederle permisos para estudiar.

Solicita se ordene al director de la carcel permita al actor adelantar sus estudios en igualdad de condiciones respecto de sus compañeros.

Derecho a la igualdad.

Al negarsele el permiso de estudio al señor torres no se vulneraron sus derechos fundamentales .

Negada

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por la Sala Penal del Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Armenia el 6 de octubre de 2004, salvo la prevención realizada al Director de la Cárcel del Distrito Judicial de Armenia en la parte resolutiva de dicha providencia, la cual se REVOCA conforme a lo expuesto en esta providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. DAR por secretaría cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.