JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 12, 2004

T-243 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jonh Fredy Alvarez Cuenca Vs Secretaria De Salud

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Seguridad Social Salud. Solicitud Tratamiento Medico Vih. Nueva Afiliacion Al Sisben. Falsedad Y Fraude Procesal. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Secretaria De Salud
  • Improcedencia por no estar acreditada vulneración de derechos fundamentales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia proferida por el Juzgado 15 Civil Municipal de Bogota, que denego la tutela interpuesta por Jonh Fredy Alvarez Cuenca.
  2. Segundo. Remitase copia de este Fallo a la Fiscalia General de la Nacion para su conocimiento.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria, LIBRESE la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991, para los fines alli contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.