JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 31, 1995

T-238 de 1995

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Antonio Barrera Carbonell

✓Claimant Jorge Enrique Forero Silva

✓
Topic · hard data
Pago De Cotizaciones Para Iniciar Demandas De Prestaciones Al Sistema De Seguridad Social. Negada
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Pension De Invalidez
  • Falta de requisitos
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Veinticinco Penal del Circuito de Santafé de Bogotá D.C., que declaró improcedente la tutela impetrada por el señor Jorge Enrique Forero Silva, pero por las razones descritas en la parte motiva de esta providencia.
  2. SEGUNDO. LIBRAR comunicación al Juzgado Veinticinco Penal del Circuito de esta ciudad, para los efectos del artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  3. Notifíquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Antonio Barrera Carbonell
Reporting justice
✓
Carlos Gaviria Díaz
Magistrado
✓
Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Magistrado
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 1cited by 1 →T-238/95T-287/94 — I.S.S. No Esta Obligado A La Prestacion De Los Servicios A Los Afiliados Cuando Se Trata De Enfermedades Preexistentes A La Afiliacion. Nega · cited 39 timesT-287/941994T-414/98 — No Reconocimiento De Pension De Invalidez Por Via De Tutela. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada. · cited 81 timesT-414/981998
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites1
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.