JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)April 26, 1994

T-205 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Borys Cristhian Paz

✓
Topic · hard data
Ders De Los Niños. Der A La Familia. Der A La Dignidad. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Menor Que No Es Aceptado Por Sus Padres. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia del Juzgado Doce Penal Municipal de Cali, de 19 de noviembre de 1993. Por consiguiente, se deniega la tutela demandada por el menor BORYS CRISTHIAN PAZ ABADIA.
  2. SEGUNDO. MODIFICAR el numeral
  3. segundo. de dicha sentencia. En su lugar quedará así: SOLICITAR la intervención inmediata del Instituto Colombiano de Bienestar Familiar para que adopte las medidas correspondientes para la protección del menor BORYS CRISTHIAN PAZ ABADIA. El Instituto deberá informar a la mayor brevedad a la Corte sobre dichas medidas.
  4. TERCERO. Para los efectos del numeral anterior, REMITIR al mencionado Instituto copia íntegra de este fallo y del expediente correspondiente.
  5. CUARTO. Comunicar la presente sentencia al Juzgado Doce Penal Municipal de Cali, para que sea notificada a las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.