JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 4, 1998

T-176 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓Claimant Otilia Ponce Castro

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. Al Trabajo. Reintegro O Reubicacion Por Supresion Del Cargo. Subsidiariedad De La Tutela. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Aseadora. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Improcedencia por vencimiento del término de caducidad de la acción
  • Improcedencia para reintegro al cargo
  • Subsidiariedad
Medio De Defensa Judicial
  • Reubicación por supresión del cargo
Derecho Al Trabajo
  • No es absoluto
3 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo motivo de revision proferido el 10 de noviembre de 1997 por el Juzgado
  2. Cuarto. Laboral de Cartagena. En consecuencia, no se concede la tutela impetrada.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaria se librara de inmediato la comunicacion de que trata el articulo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos del caso.
  4. Copiese, codifiquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Appears in the rulingN1 · hard data
✓
Alejandro Martínez Caballero
Reporting justice
✓
Fabio Morón Díaz
Magistrado
✓
Vladimiro Naranjo Mesa
Presidente
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
← cites 3cited by 1 →T-176/98T-426/92 — Derecho De Peticion. Derecho A La Seguridad Social. Derechos De Las Personas De La Tercera Edad.Concedida Parcialmente. · cited 641 timesT-426/921992T-002/92 — Derecho A La Educacion. Autonomia Universitaria. Universidad Tecnologica De Pereira. Negada · cited 266 timesT-002/921992T-047/95 — Der. Al Trabajo. Concurso De Meritos. Der. A La Igualdad. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada. · cited 50 timesT-047/951995T-726/98 — Debido Proceso. Nombramiento De Docente Sin Presentar Concurso En Un Cargo De Carrera. Medio De Defensa Judicial. Negada. · cited 2 timesT-726/981998
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites3
Cited by1

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.