JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 12, 2000

T-1729 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Nidia Garcia Gongora Vs. Cajanal Cali

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Vida Salud Seguridad Social Y Minimo Vital. Pago Oportuno De Mesadas Pensionales. Sustitucion Pensional A Menor De Edad. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Sustitución Pensional
  • Hija huérfana menor de edad
Derecho Al Minimo Vital De Hija Huerfana Menor De Edad
  • Mora en el pago de mesadas pensionales
Derechos Sociales, Economicos Y Culturales O De Segunda Generacion
  • Tesis de conexidad entre derecho prestacional y derecho fundamental
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Cali-Sala Laboral de fecha 16 de junio de 2000.
  2. Segundo. TUTELAR los derechos a la vida, salud y seguridad social de la peticionaria NIDIA GARCIA GONGORA. En consecuencia se ordena a Cajanal-Seccional Cali, que en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas siguientes a la notificación de esta sentencia, pague a la actora el valor de su mesada pensional, la cual le fue reconocida y sustituída mediante la Resolución 010043 de 9 de agosto de 1999.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria general, líbrense las comunicaciones previstas en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991, para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.