JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 24, 2006

T-148 de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓Claimant Teresa Cadena De Torres Vs. Iss

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Carencia actual de objeto
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a la salud y la vida en condiciones dignas de afiliada a quien la entidad se ha negado a autorizarle los examenes de manometria ano rectal y esfinteromanometria anal formulados por su medico tratante.

Solicita se ordene autorizar los examenes formulados.

Sustracción de materia.

Tal y como lo informó la accionante al juez de primera instancia a la fecha no solo le han sido practicados los exámenes que requiere sino que se le hizo una intervención quirúrgica con resultados satisfactorios para la recuperación de su salud.

Carencia actual de objeto

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia del Juzgado Dieciocho Penal del Circuito de Bogotá que se revisa, en cuanto denegó la acción de tutela de la referencia.
  2. Segundo. Declarar la carencia actual de objeto.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria General, líbrense las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.