JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 23, 1994

T-142 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía

✓Claimant Antonia Ortega De Lopez

✓
Topic · hard data
Accion Indemnizatoria. Proceso De Muerte Por Desaparecimiento. Mayoria De Edad De Los Hijos. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo del Tribunal Superior de Santa Marta, de 7 de septiembre de 1993, por las razones expuestas en la presente sentencia, y confirmar el del Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Civil de Santa Marta, de 17 de agosto de 1993. En consecuencia, no se concede la tutela demandada por la señora ANTONIA ISABEL ORTEGA DE LOPEZ contra el Juzgado
  3. Tercero. Penal Municipal de Santa Marta.
  4. Segundo. Comunicar la presente sentencia al Juzgado
  5. Tercero. Civil de Santa Marta, para que sea notificada a las partes, de conformidad con lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentEduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.