JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 21, 2000

T-1272 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Indalecio Gomez Otavo Vs. Universidad Autonoma De Colombia

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho A La Igualdad A La Educacion Y A La Libertad De Enseñanza De Persona Perteneciente A La Comunidad Indigena De Tres Esquinas Vereda De Coyaima (Tolima). No Entrega De Notas Por Desembolso Tardio Del Dinero Por Parte Del Icetex. Facultad De Relaciones Economicas Internacionales. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Carencia actual de objeto
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. CONFIRMAR el fallo proferido por el Juzgado 12 Penal Municipal de Santa Fe de Bogotá, mediante el cual se negó la tutela solicitada.
  2. Segundo. Dar cumplimiento a lo dispuesto en el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.