JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)December 12, 2008

T-1250 de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Jorge Iván Velez Correa·Respondent Ips Universitaria Servicios De Salud Universidad De Antioquia

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Carencia Actual De Objeto Por Daño Consumado
  • Fallecimiento del actor durante el trámite de la acción de tutela
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Derecho a morir dignamente de usuario de la IPS accionada quien padece carcinoma en colon ascendente con compromiso transmural quien ha solicitado reiteradamente de manera infructuosa la realización en su favor del procedimiento de la eutanasia. pide que se ordene a la accionada efectuar el servicio en cuestión.

Carencia de objeto por fallecimiento del titular de los derechos invocados en la tutela revisada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. Confirmar la sentencia proferida el 27 de mayo de 2008, por el Juzgado Dieciocho Penal del Circuito con Funciones de Conocimiento de Medellin.
  2. Segundo. Declarar la carencia de objeto y abstenerse de impartir orden alguna.
  3. Tercero. Por Secretaria, librese la comunicacion prevista en el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.