JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)September 18, 2000

T-1212 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Gladys Lozano Andrade Y Otros Vs. Hospital San Juan Bautista Y "mineros Unidos Ltda".

✓
Topic · hard data
Pago De Acreencias Laborales. Naturaleza Del Subsidio Familiar. Concedida.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Subsidio Familiar
  • Naturaleza jurídica
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (5 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR los fallos proferidos, en los casos de la referencia, por los juzgados
  2. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Chaparral,
  3. Segundo. Civil del Circuito del mismo municipio, y los juzgados Penal Municipal de Amagá y Penal del Circuito de Titiribí, que negaron la tutela, y en su lugar, CONCEDER la protección judicial solicitada por los accionantes.
  4. Segundo. ORDENAR al Hospital San Juan Bautista de Chaparral, y a la empresa "Mineros Unidos Ltda" que, en el término de cuarenta y ocho (48) horas, contadas a partir de la notificación del presente fallo, procedan al pago del subsidio familiar que adeudan a las correspondientes cajas de compensación familiar por los siguientes empleados: Gladys Lozano Andrade, José Ulises Gutiérrez Cabezas, Edfilia Reinoso de Padilla, Margarita Rodríguez Silva, Alcira Ramírez, Martha Esperanza Méndez Oviedo, Felipa Quiñones Suárez y Blanca Libia Gómez Quiñones, Luis Fernando Granados Pérez y León Eduardo García.
  5. Tercero. Por Secretaría LIBRESE la comunicación de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.