JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 14, 1994

T-119 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Secundino Andrade

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Pension De Jubilacion. Silencio Administrativo. I.S.S. Concedida Parcialmente.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la Sentencia proferida por el Tribunal Superior del Distrito Judicial de Santa Marta, Sala Laboral, el día
  2. primero. (1) de octubre de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993) salvo en la parte que reza "Igualmente se ordena al mencionado DIRECTOR para que en un plazo no superior a los diez (10) días le cancele al accionante las mesadas pensionales que la Entidad le llegue a reconocer, en caso de acceder a la impugnación de la Resolución arriba identificadas o en su defecto cancele las mesadas ya reconocidas en dicha Resolución, con su respectivo reajuste correspondiente a 1993", la cual se revoca. Se previene al Instituto Colombiano de Seguros Sociales para que adelante las diligencias administrativas encaminadas al pago oportuno de las mesadas adeudadas en el evento de que no se hubieren cancelado.
  3. SEGUNDO. LIBRENSE por Secretaría las comunicaciones de que trata el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991 para los efectos allí contemplados.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.