JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)March 11, 1994

T-118 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Hernando Herrera Vergara

✓Claimant Carmen Pardo De Pulido

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. De Peticion. Pension O Indemnizacion Por Perdida Del Oido. Caja Nal De Prevision. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Indemnizacion
  • Reconocimiento
Derechos Fundamentales
  • Mención en la demanda
Juez De Tutela
  • Facultades de oficio
4 topics · 4 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. CONFIRMAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado Veintiuno Civil Municipal de Santafé de Bogotá el día catorce (14) de septiembre de mil novecientos noventa y tres (1993).
  2. SEGUNDO. LIBRENSE por secretaría las comunicaciones a las que se refiere el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela
Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.