JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 18, 2002

T-100 de 2002

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Rodrigo Escobar Gil

✓Claimant Francisco Diaz Ramirez Y Otros Vs. Gerencia De Salud Palmira Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Derechos A La Vida Debido Proceso Igualdad Y Familia. Revocacion Permisos. Visita De Inspeccion Ocular. Reubicacion Sala De Tanatopraxia. Hecho Consumado. Carencia Actual De Objeto. Corporacion Renacer. Cvc. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Acción De Tutela
  • Hecho consumado
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. CONFIRMAR la sentencias proferidas por los Juzgados
  2. Quinto. (Expediente T-488896) y
  3. Sexto. (Expediente T-489066) Civil Municipal de Palmira (Valle), mediante las cuales se nego el amparo del derecho a la vida digna, al debido proceso, a la familia y a la igualdad de los senores Francisco Diaz Ramirez y Jaime Giraldo.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.