JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)February 5, 2013

T-052 de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Nilson Elías Pinilla Pinilla

✓Claimant Nora Evellyn Clara Constanza Rios Ramirez·Respondent Cajanal

01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Para Reliquidacion De Pensiones
  • Improcedencia por no cumplir con los criterios jurisprudenciales para la procedencia excepcional
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

La accionante promovió la acción de tutela contra CAJANAL, aduciendo vulneración de los derechos fundamentales al debido proceso, a la igualdad, a la seguridad social, al mínimo vital, a la dignidad humana y el de petición, además de incurrir en vía de hecho, al negarse a reliquidar su pensión de vejez de acuerdo al régimen especial consagrado en el Decreto 546 de 1971.

Se reitera que la acción de tutela únicamente procede cuando el afectado no disponga de otro medio de defensa nacional o se encuentre frente a un perjuicio irremediable, requisitos que no se cumplen en el presente caso.

Se declara la IMPROCEDENCIA de la acción de tutela deprecada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia de junio 27 de 2012, proferida por el Juzgado
  2. Segundo. Penal del Circuito de Cartago, que concedio la tutela incoada por Nora Evellyn Clara Constanza Rios Ramirez contra la Caja Nacional de Prevision Social, EICE, Cajanal, en liquidacion. En su lugar, se dispone DECLARAR IMPROCEDENTE dicha accion.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaria General, LIBRESE la comunicacion a que alude el articulo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.