JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)May 28, 1992

T-013 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Fabio Morón Díaz

✓Claimant Victor Mendoza Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Derecho De Posesion. Debido Proceso. Querella De Amparo. Posesion De Predio Aledaño A Edificio En Ruina. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (6 points)
  1. en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. Primero. REVOCAR la sentencia proferida por el Juzgado
  4. Primero. Civil del Circuito de Chiquinquirá el 8 de noviembre de 1991, en el caso de la Acción de Tutela presentada por VICTOR MANUEL MENDOZA y MARIA LUCRECIA CASTILLO.
  5. Segundo. Comuníquese la presente decisión al Despacho Judicial de origen para que sea notificada conforme lo dispone el artículo 36 del Decreto 2591 de 1991.
  6. Tercero. Comuníquese la presente decisión a la Alcaldía Municipal de Chiquinquirá.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.