JurídicoESEN
Tutela ruling (T)January 21, 1999

T-006 de 1999

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Castro Alvarado William Tomas Y Otro·Respondent Direccion Nacional De Admon. Judicial Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Der. A La Igualdad. Improcedencia De La Tutela Para El Pago Exclusivo De La Indexacion. Empleados De La Rama Judicial. Negada.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Indexacion De Cesantias Parciales
  • Improcedencia de tutela para cobro exclusivo
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (3 points)
  1. Primero. REVOCAR el fallo del Tribunal Superior de Valledupar, Sala de Decisión Laboral del 30 de julio de 1998, que a su vez confirmó el fallo del Juzgado
  2. Tercero. Laboral del Circuito de la misma ciudad, que concedió la tutela impetrada por losseñores William Castro Alvrado, Olga Plata Daza y Leonor Graciela González de Bolaño, y en su lugar, DENIEGA el amparo solicitado. En caso de haberse efectuado el pago ordenado por los falladores de instancia, se entenderá como pago de lo debido, por lo que no habrá lugar a obtener la devolución de las sumas pagadas.
  3. Segundo. Por Secretaría, líbrense las comunicaciones pertinentes, para los efectos señalados por el artículo 36 del decreto 2591 de 1991.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.