JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 19, 2001Full bench

C-993 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Clara Inés Vargas Hernández

✓Claimant Alfredo Castaño Martinez

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Conciliación Laboral Extrajudicial Como Requisito De Procedibilidad
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Vigencia inmediata de artículo en ley de conciliación
  • Conciliación extrajudicial en materia laboral como requisito de procedibilidad
  • Defensores del cliente de instituciones financieras en ley de conciliación
1 topic · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 640 de 2001.

Arts. 35 (p.) 47 y 50 (p.).

Conciliacion extrajudicial.

Requisito de procedibilidad.

Defensor del cliente de entidad financiera.

Prestacion de servicios.

Vigencia.

Principio de alternatividad.

Cosa juzgada constitucional.

Estese a la sentencia c- 500/01

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 640/01. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 35Ley 640/01ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 47Ley 640/01ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 50Ley 640/01ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Primero. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-893 de 2001 que declaro INEXEQUIBLE la expresion "laboral" del articulo 35 de la Ley 640 de 2001.
  2. Segundo. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C- 500 de 2001, que declaro la INEXEQUIBILIDAD del articulo 47 y de la expresion "salvo el articulo 47, que regira inmediatamente" del articulo 50 de la Ley 640 de 2001.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceMarco Gerardo Monroy Cabra
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.