C-986 de 2005
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño
✓Claimant Julio Ernesto Hencker Arcila
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Improcedencia
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 36 de 1973.
Por la cual se reconoce el periodismo como una profesión y se reglamenta su ejercicio y se dictan otras disposiciones.
Asegura el demandante que con la declaratoria de inexequibilidad de la ley 51 de 1975 por parte de la corte constitucional en la sentencia c-087 de 1998 recobró vida jurídica la ley ahora acusada y como el contenido de ésta es casi idéntico a pesar de contener dos artículos más adolece de los mismos vicios de inconstitucionalidad que la anterior.
Cosa juzgada.
Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia del 8 de agosto de 1974 proferida por la sala plena de la corte suprema de justicia que declaro inexequible la ley 136 de 1973
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 36/73. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE:
- ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia del 8 de agosto de 1974, proferida por la Sala Plena de la Corte Suprema de Justicia, que declaro inexequible la Ley 36 de 1973.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.