JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 12, 2001Full bench

C-976 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Carlos Mauricio Duque Arboleda Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Contrato Sin Cumplimiento De Requisitos Legales
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Contrato sin cumplimiento de requisitos legales
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 100 de 1980.

Art. 146 ley 80 de 1993.

Art. 57 y ley 599 de 2000.

Art. 410.

Codigo penal.

Contrato sin cumplimiento de los requisitos legales.

Infraccion de las normas de contratacion por parte de los servidores publicos.

Cosa juzgada constitucional

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 100/80. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 146Decreto 100/80ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 57Ley 80/93UPHELD
Art. 410Ley 599/00UPHELD
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E :
  3. Primero. Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia C-917 de agosto 29 de 2001, que declaró exequibles los artículos 146 del decreto 100 de 1980 (modificado por los artículos 1 del decreto 141 de 1980, 57 de la ley 80 de 1993 y 18 y 32 de la ley 190 de 1995) y 410 de la ley 599 de 2000.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceJaime Araujo Rentería
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

Cites0
It cites no recorded decisions.
Cited by0
No decision cites it yet.

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.