JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 16, 2001Full bench

C-869 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Manuel Armando Gonzalez Cañon Y Otra

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional Parcial En Beneficios Fiscales Concurrentes
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 383 de 1997.

Art 23.

Fortalecimiento de la lucha contra la evasion y el contrabando.

Beneficios fiscales concurrentes .

Donaciones efectuadas por personas naturales o jurídicas.

Impuesto sobre la renta.

Unidad normativa.

Cosa juzgada.

Inhibida.

Estese a lo resuelto en c-806/01

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 383/97. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 23Ley 383/97DECLINED TO RULE
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Declararse INHIBIDA para llevar a cabo un pronunciamiento de fondo respecto del artículo 23 de la Ley 383 de 1997, salvo en relación con las expresión "Interprétase con autoridad a partir de la vigencia de la presente ley", contenida en dicho artículo, respecto de la cual ordena ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-806 de 2001.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.