JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 29, 2000Full bench

C-802 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Rosmery Torres Saenz

✓
Topic · hard data
Distrito Capital. No Todas Las Reglas Especiales Deben Reflejarse En Los Otros Distritos
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Legislador
  • Regulación de estructura de entidades en actividad deportiva
  • Competencia en organización del sistema deportivo
Liga Deportiva
  • Restricciones
  • Asociación o corporación de derecho privado
  • Funcionamiento en departamentos y Distrito Capital
  • Jurisdicción territorial
Actividad Deportiva
  • Facultad del legislador para establecer elementos que faciliten promoción y dirección
Asamblea Departamental
  • Regulación del deporte
Deporte
  • Interés público
Distrito Capital
  • No todas las reglas especiales deben reflejarse en los otros distritos
Libertad De Asociacion
  • Prácticas deportivas
10 topics · 12 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto-ley 1228 de 1995.

Art.7.

Naturaleza e integracion de las ligas deportivas.

Patrocinar y dirigir la actividad deportiva.

Exequible.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1228/95. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 7Decreto 1228/95UPHELD
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el artículo 7º del Decreto 1228 de 1.995.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.