JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 18, 2004Full bench

C-785 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Marco Gerardo Monroy Cabra

✓Claimant Rafael Emiro Marin Gonzalez

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Régimen De Transición En Pensiones
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Régimen de transición en pensiones
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 860 de 2003 art. 4.

Disposiciones en materia de pensiones modifica y adiciona el regimen de transición previsto en el articulo 36 de la ley 100 de 1993.

Cosa juzgada constitucional estarse a lo resuelto en sentencia c-754/04

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 100/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionLey 100/93ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 4Ley 860/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-754 de 2004 de la Corte Constitucional, que decidio "Declarar inexequible el articulo 4o de la Ley 860 de 2003, "Por la cual se reforman algunas disposiciones del Sistema General de Pensiones previsto en la Ley 100 de 1993 y se dictan otras disposiciones".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
ConcurrenceManuel José Cepeda EspinosaConcurrenceJaime Araujo RenteríaConcurrenceRodrigo Uprimny Yepes
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.