JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 19, 2003Full bench

C-716 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Juan Ramirez Sierra

✓
Topic · hard data
Codigo De Procedimiento Civil. Art. 372 (P.). Modificado Por Decreto 2282 De 1989. Art. 1 Num. 187. Admision Recurso De Casacion Per Saltum. Estimacion Del Interes Para Recurrir. Inadmisibilidad Por Razon De La Cuantia. Falta De Competencia. Supremacía De
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Control De Constitucionalidad
  • Inexistencia de vicio de inexequibilidad
Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad
  • Ausencia de concepto de violación
Recurso De Casacion
  • Admisión
  • Concesión
  • Cuantía para recurrir
  • Inadmisión por razón de la cuantía
  • Trámite procesal
  • Criterio de eficacia y eficiencia
  • Facultad del legislador para establecer recursos y regular requisitos para su procedencia
  • Finalidad
  • Interposición
  • Juicio valorativo
  • Principio de independencia funcional
  • Procedencia
  • Requisitos
  • Valoración de factor objetivo
Debido Proceso
  • Recursos, garantía en actuaciones judiciales y administrativas
Recursos
  • Clasificación
  • Finalidad
6 topics · 20 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1400/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 372Decreto 1400/70 «inciso 2»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. Declarar EXEQUIBLE el inciso
  2. segundo. del articulo 372 del Codigo de Procedimiento Civil, por los cargos expuestos en la demanda.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.