JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)August 12, 2003Full bench

C-694 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Luz Elvira Olivares Rivera Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 734 De 2002. Art. 25 (P.). Codigo Disciplinario Unico. Destinatarios De La Ley Disciplinaria. Servidores Publicos Aun Retirados Del Servico Particulares E Indigenas Que Administren Recursos Del Estado. Autonomia Territorial. Diversidad Etnica Y Cultur
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Codigo Disciplinario Unico
  • Inclusión como destinatarios de la ley disciplinaria a los indígenas que administran recursos públicos no contraría la Constitución
Norma Acusada
  • Estado debe otorgar capacitación a las autoridades indígenas para que tengan pleno conocimiento del contenido de las normas disciplinarias
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 734/02. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 25Ley 734/02ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-127 de 2003 en relación con la expresión "[l]os indígenas que administren recursos del Estado serán disciplinados conforme a este Código", contenida en el inciso 2° del artículo 25 de la Ley 734 de 2002.
  4. Có
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceManuel José Cepeda Espinosa
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.