JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 28, 2005Full bench

C-671 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alvaro Tafur Galvis

✓Claimant Leonel Olivar Bonilla

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Medidas Correctivas De Policia
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Absoluta
  • Configuración en aplicación de medidas correctivas del Código Nacional de Policía
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 1355 de 1970 articulo 226 expresion "o en el reglamento".

Se dictan normas sobre policia.

Medida correctiva aplicable en cada caso.

Existencia de cosa juzgada constitucional absoluta en relacion con la expresión "o el reglamento" contenida en el articulo 226 del decreto 1355 de 1970 frente a lo decidido en la sentencia c-593 de 2005 que declaro la inexequibilidad de dicho precepto normativo frente a cargos idénticos a los que plantea el actor en el presente proceso.

Estarse a lo resuelto en la sentencia c-593 de 2005

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 1355/70. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 226Decreto 1355/70ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-593 de 2005, M.P. Manuel Jose Cepeda Espinosa, que declaro la inexequibilidad de las expresiones "o en el reglamento" contenidas en el articulo 226 del Decreto 1355 de 1970 "Por el cual se dictan normas sobre policia".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.