C-667 de 2005
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa
✓Claimant Alvaro Eduardo Palacio Arciniegas
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
- Configuración
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Ley 842 de 2003 articulos 2 4 5 6 18 y 20 (parcialmente demandados).
Modifica la reglamentación del ejercicio de la ingenieria de sus profesiones afines y de sus profesiones auxiliares se adopta el codigo de etica profesional y se dictan otras disposiciones.
Ampliación de la clasificacion nacional de ocupaciones.
Existencia de cosa juzgada constitucional.
Respecto de la disposicion acusada no hay lugar a pronunciarse nuevamente sobre el asunto de la referencia.
Estese a lo resuelto en la sentencia c-191/05
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 842/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- en nombre del Pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
- RESUELVE
- ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C- 191 de 2005, que declaro la constitucionalidad del articulo 5 de la Ley 842 de 2003, con el condicionamiento en ella establecido.
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.