JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)December 10, 1992Full bench

C-600 de 1992

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Eduardo Cifuentes Muñoz

✓Claimant Carlos Sanchez

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 23/82. Derechos De Autor. Prevalencia Del Derecho Sustancial. Constitucional.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

3 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 23/82. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Corte Constitucional,
  2. R E S U E L V E
  3. PRIMERO. Declarase subsanado el vicio de procedimiento de que adolecia la Ley 23 de 1.982, consistente en su indebida sancion y, habiendose verificado por el Gobierno su sancion regular, declarase su constitucionalidad en lo que se refiere a los requisitos de forma.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.