JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)May 27, 2003Full bench

C-432 de 2003

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Edgar Alfredo Garzon Saboya

✓
Topic · hard data
Ley 488 De 1998. Art. 102 (P.). Normas En Materia Tributaria. Disposiciones Fiscales De Entes Territoriales. Certificado De Desarrollo Turistico. Exclusion Incentivo Fiscal A Establecimientos Hoteleros. Derecho A La Igualdad. Potestad De Configuracion Leg
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Congreso
  • Competencia en materia tributaria
  • Competencia impositiva respecto a beneficios fiscales
  • Soberanía fiscal no es absoluta
Certificado De Desarrollo Turistico
  • Beneficio fiscal
  • Creación, supresión y reedición
  • Evolución normativa
  • Finalidad
  • Norma demandada no afecta periodos fiscales consolidados
Impuesto
  • Obligación de pagar
4 topics · 10 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 488/98. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 102Ley 488/98 «y que hayan sus inversionistas anexado la información ante la mis...»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. R E S U E L V E:
  3. 1. Declarase EXEQUIBLE la expresion "y que hayan sus inversionistas anexado la informacion ante la misma entidad para solicitar los certificados de desarrollo turistico antes del 28 de febrero de 1996", contenida en el articulo 102 de la ley 488 de 1998, pero solo por los cargos formulados y examinados en la parte motiva.
  4. 2. Copiese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.