C-336 de 1996
The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.
Reporting justice Jorge Arango Mejía
✓Claimant Leopoldo Velasquez Toro
Topics and subtopics of the ruling
✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)
Demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra el art. 2 (parcial) de la Ley 16 de 1985, "Por la cual se modifica la ley 182 de 1948 sobre Propiedad Horizontal".
El actor consideró que el articulado demandado no puede tener efectos retroactivos porque estarían desconociendo derechos adquiridos con anterioridad.
La Corte concluyó que el aparte demando no señaló ningún carácter retroactivo de la ley, la norma es clara en señalar que los inmuebles sometidos al régimen de propiedad horizontal de conformidad con la ley 182 de 1948, no dejaron de estarlo al entrar en vigor la ley 16 de 1985.
Se declaró exequible el artículo 2 de la ley 16 de 1985.
What it decided
Holdings on Ley 182/48. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.
Operative part (Resuelve)
✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.
- Declarase EXEQUIBLE el articulo 2o. de la ley 16 de 1985.
- Notifiquese,
The bench that decided
We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.
How it connects
Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.
The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.