JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)July 7, 1994Full bench

C-310 de 1994

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alejandro Martínez Caballero

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 951/94. Por El Cual Se Dictan Normas En Materia Procesal Penal. Inexequible.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Conmocion Interior
  • Causas
  • Inconstitucionalidad de decretos expedidos
2 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 951/94. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 951/94STRUCK DOWN
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE el Decreto 951 del 10 de mayo de 1994, "por el cual se dictan medidas en materia procesal penal".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available3
DissentFabio Morón DíazDissentVladimiro Naranjo MesaDissentHernando Herrera Vergara
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.