JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)June 17, 1998Full bench

C-300 de 1998

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice José Gregorio Hernández Galindo

✓Claimant Carlos Humberto Quispe Fuertes

✓
Topic · hard data
Dec. 2277/79. Art. 10 Parcial. Requisitos Para Ascenso Al Escalafon Docente. Exequibles.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Carrera Docente
  • Profesionalización
Escalafon Docente
  • Ascenso
  • Calificación de la obra
Principio De Igualdad Para Docente
  • Equiparación entre título obtenido y elaboración de una obra
4 topics · 5 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2277/79. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 10Decreto 2277/79 «respecto del Grado 14 del Escalafón Nacional Docente, las expresiones "y que cumpla uno de los siguientes requisitos" y "reconocido por el Ministerio de Educación Nacional o autoría de una obra de carácter científico, pedagógico o técnico".»UPHELD
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. En los términos de esta Sentencia, decláranse EXEQUIBLES, en el artículo 10 del Decreto Ley 2277 de 1979, respecto del Grado 14 del Escalafón Nacional Docente, las expresiones "y que cumpla uno de los siguientes requisitos" y "reconocido por el Ministerio de Educación Nacional o autoría de una obra de carácter científico, pedagógico o técnico".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
DissentEduardo Cifuentes Muñoz
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.