JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)April 6, 2011Full bench

C-264 de 2011

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jorge Ignacio Pretelt Chaljub

✓Claimant Revision De Constitucionalidad·Respondent Decreto Legislativo 142 Del 21 De Enero De 2011

✓
Topic · hard data
Inconstitucionalidad Por Consecuencia. Aseguramiento De Riesgos Como Funcion Del Fondo Adaptacion
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto Legislativo 142 del 21 de enero de 2011.

Por el cual se adiciona el Decreto 4819 de 2010.

Revisión Oficiosa de Constitucionalidad.

En el presente caso se da la figura jurídica de inconstitucionalidad por consecuencia, por cuanto la Corte Constitucional mediante sentencia C-216/11 declaró la inexequibilidad del Decreto 020 de 2011, norma jurídica en que se sustentó el Decreto que ahora se examina.

INEXEQUIBLE

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 4819/10. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionDecreto 4819/10STRUCK DOWN
Phrase struck down«Por el cual se adiciona el Decreto 4819 de 2010»
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. PRIMERO. Declarar INEXEQUIBLE EL Decreto Legislativo 142 del 21 de enero de 2011 "Por el cual se adiciona el Decreto 4819 de 2010".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.