JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)February 7, 2001Full bench

C-145 de 2001

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Luis Eduardo Montealegre Lynett

✓Claimant Rafael Rengifo Delgado Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Reclasificación Del Régimen Simplificado Al Común
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Contribuyente
  • Improcedencia de recurso por reclasificación del régimen
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Reclasificación del régimen simplificado al común
Regimen Comun Al Simplificado
  • Improcedencia de recurso por reclasificación
3 topics · 3 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 49 de 1990.

Art. 43 que adiciono el art. 508-1 del estatuto tributario.

Repatriacion de capitales.

Estimulo del mercado accionario.

Reclasificiacion del regimen simplificado al comun.

Cosa juzgada constitucional.

Estese sentencia 85/91 c.s.j.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 49/90. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 43Ley 49/90ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en Sentencia No. 85 del 18 de julio de 1991 por medio de la cual, la Sala Plena de la Corte Suprema de Justicia declaró exequible el artículo 508-1 del Estatuto Tributario, tal y como fue modificado por el artículo 43 de la Ley 49 de 1990
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.