JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)September 26, 2000Full bench

C-1317 de 2000

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Carlos Ossa Escobar

✓
Topic · hard data
Decreto 266 De 2000. Arts. 121 122 125 Y 126. Normas Para Suprimir Y Reformar Las Regulaciones Tramites Y Procedimientos. Derechos De Las Camaras De Comercio Por Los Servicios Que Presta. Fijacion De Tarifas En El Registro De Proponentes. Patrimonio. Destinacion. Estese <a Href=../2000/C-1316-00.Rtf> C-1316/00</A>.
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Supresión y reforma de trámites
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 266/00. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 121Decreto 266/00STRUCK DOWN
Art. 122Decreto 266/00STRUCK DOWN
Art. 125Decreto 266/00STRUCK DOWN
Art. 126Decreto 266/00STRUCK DOWN
4 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

See the operative part (4 points)
  1. ESTESE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-1316 de septiembre 26 de 2000, que en su parte resolutiva manifestó :
  2. "
  3. Primero. Declarar inexequible el numeral 5 del artículo 1 de la ley 573 de 2000, a partir de su promulgación.
  4. Segundo. Declarar inexequible, en su integridad, el decreto 266 del 22 de febrero de 2000, a partir de su promulgación".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available2
ConcurrenceVladimiro Naranjo MesaConcurrenceAlvaro Tafur Galvis
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.