JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)March 13, 2013Full bench

C-129 de 2013

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Mauricio González Cuervo

✓Claimant Juan Camilo Medina Contreras Y Otra·Respondent Ley 98 De 1993, Articulo 2, Inciso Segundo

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada Constitucional En Exclusion De Tiras Comicas E Historietas Graficas Del Ambito De La Ley De Democratizacion Y Fomento Del Libro Colombiano
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Exclusion De Tiras Comicas E Historietas Graficas Del Ambito De La Ley De Democratizacion Y Fomento Del Libro Colombiano
  • Cosa juzgada constitucional respecto de la inexequibilidad contenida en artículo 2 de la Ley 98 de 1993
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Demanda de inconstitucionalidad contra la expresión “tiras cómicas o historietas gráficas” contenida en el inciso segundo del artículo 2 de la Ley 98 de 1993.

Los demandantes alegan violación de los artículos 2, 13, 70, 71, 333 y 363 de la Constitución.

Tras constatar la existencia de una cosa juzgada constitucional, la Corte decide ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la sentencia C-1023/12, respecto a la expresión normativa acusada.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 98/93. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 2Ley 98/93ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
1 holding · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C-1023 de 2012 respecto de la expresion "tiras comicas o historietas graficas" del inciso
  2. segundo. del articulo 2 de la Ley 98 de 1993.
  3. Notifiquese, comuniquese,
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.