JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)November 12, 2008Full bench

C-1126 de 2008

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Manuel José Cepeda Espinosa

✓
Topic · hard data
Demanda Contra Decretos Reglamentarios. Competencia Del Consejo De Estado
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion De La Corte Constitucional
  • Falta de competencia sobre decreto
Demanda Contra Decretos Reglamentarios
  • Competencia del Consejo de Estado
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Decreto 2153 de 1992 "por el cual se reestructura la superintendencia de industria y comercio y se dictan otras disposiciones", artículos 4-12 y 52 (parcial). <br>la norma de que se trata otorga al superintendente de industri ay comercio la posibilidad de ordenar la clausura de una investigación cuando, a su juicio, el presunto infractor brinde garantías suficientes de que suspenderá o modificará la conducta por la cual se le investiga. <br>los cagros que a las expresiones demandadas endilga el actor se basan en su consideración de que las mismas impiden que se adelanten juicios de responsabilidad administrativa por infracciones legales, pues permiten al particular sustraerse de dicha responsabilidad. <br>se reafirmó que la corte constitucional no es competente para revisar la exequibilidad de decretos expedidos bajo la previsión del artículo 20 superior, por ello, se resolvió declararse inhibida para estudiar la demanda de la referencia.

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Decreto 2153/92. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 12Decreto 2153/92DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 4Decreto 2153/92DECLINED TO RULE
Art. 52Decreto 2153/92DECLINED TO RULE
3 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE
  3. Por carecer de competencia para resolver sobre la constitucionalidad del Decreto 2153 de 1992, declárase INHIBIDA para resolver sobre la demanda de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.