JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 26, 2004Full bench

C-1053 de 2004

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Araujo Rentería

✓Claimant Luis Alonso Velasco Parrado Y Otro

✓
Topic · hard data
Cosa Juzgada En Prohibición De Prestación De Servicios De Salud En Forma Directa
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Cosa Juzgada Constitucional
  • Prohibición de prestación de servicios de salud en forma directa
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Ley 812 de 2003 art. 53 (parcial) decreto 010 de 2004 arts. 1 3 9 y 10 y decreto 074 de 2004 art. 1.

Aprueba el plan nacional de desarrollo 2003-2006.

Prohibición de prestacion de servicios de salud en forma directa.

Existencia de cosa juzgada constitucional

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Ley 812/03. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

Art. 53Ley 812/03ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO
Art. 1Decreto 10/04STRUCK DOWN
Art. 10Decreto 10/04STRUCK DOWN
Art. 3Decreto 10/04STRUCK DOWN
Art. 9Decreto 10/04STRUCK DOWN
On the entire provisionDecreto 74/04STRUCK DOWN
6 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitución,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ESTARSE A LO RESUELTO en la Sentencia C- 305 de 2004, que declaró inexequible el Art. 53 de la Ley 812 de 2003, "por la cual se aprueba el Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2003-2006, hacia un Estado comunitario".
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.