JurídicoESEN
Constitutional review ruling (C)October 19, 2005Full bench

C-1052 de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Alfredo Beltrán Sierra

✓Claimant Humberto De Jesús Longas Londoño

✓
Topic · hard data
Fallo Inhibitorio En Control De Constitucionalidad De Acto Legislativo De Reeleccion
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Inhibicion En Control De Constitucionalidad De Acto Legislativo
  • Interpretación equivocada de disposición acusada
1 topic · 1 subtopic · source: case-law reporter's topic index
Case-law reporter's summary (what was argued and decided, in prose)

Acto legislativo 02 de 2004.

Por el cual se reforman algunos articulos de la constitución politica y se dictan otras disposiciones.

El demandante manifiesta que la norma acusada cuiya inexequibilidad solicita se declare es violatoria del preámbulo y los articulos 1 2 3 4 40 103 114 115 189 190 374 y siguientes de la carta.

Inhibición por ineptitud sustancial de la demanda.

Las demandas mediante las cuales se originen los procesos que se adelanten ante la corte constitucional cuando ella actúa en función de control de constitucionalidad deben sujetarse a los requisitos mínimos establecidos en el decreto 2067 de 1991 cuyo examen se impone previamente en los fallos correspondientes.

Inhibida

Case-law reporter's text · normalized for reading (all caps → sentence case)
02

What it decided

Holdings on Acto_legislativo 02/04. Hard data, verified against the operative part — citable.

On the entire provisionActo_legislativo 02/04DECLINED TO RULE
On the entire provisionActo_legislativo 02/04DECLINED TO RULE
2 holdings · source: operative part of the ruling
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. en nombre del pueblo y por mandato de la Constitucion,
  2. RESUELVE :
  3. Inhibirse para pronunciarse sobre la constitucionalidad del Acto Legislativo No 02 de 2004 por ineptitud sustantiva de la demanda
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

Separate opinions — text available1
ConcurrenceAlfredo Beltrán Sierra
Official text from the case-law reporter · the most valuable part of the ruling: the positions that did not carry the majority.
04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.